Loading company filing…
Find a company. Follow its revenue through costs and profit.
Coverage includes separate ticker and security records; counts are not unique companies.
Sankey diagram of Las Vegas Sands Corp.. A complete text table follows the diagram.
Marina Bay Sands generated more property EBITDA than five Macao casinos and related operations combined, despite producing substantially less revenue.
Swipe to explore
All Sankey values are reported property revenue, segment expense, or adjusted property EBITDA amounts before intersegment eliminations. Adjusted property EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure.
Labels and narrative explain the filing. A category marked “arithmetic bridge” or “residual” is calculated from reported totals, rather than a separately reported line.
| Category | Stage | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Macao integrated resorts | 1 | $2.1B | Five casinos plus ferry operations |
| Marina Bay Sands | 1 | $1.5B | One Singapore integrated resort |
| Macao property expenses | 2 | $1.5B | Payroll, gaming taxes and operations |
| Macao adjusted property EBITDA | 2 | $633M | 30% property margin |
| Singapore property expenses | 2 | $699M | Payroll, gaming taxes and operations |
| Marina Bay Sands adjusted EBITDA | 2 | $788M | 53% property margin |
| Consolidated adjusted property EBITDA | 3 | $1.4B | Before corporate and development costs |
| From | To | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Macao integrated resorts | Macao property expenses | $1.5B |
| Macao integrated resorts | Macao adjusted property EBITDA | $633M |
| Marina Bay Sands | Singapore property expenses | $699M |
| Marina Bay Sands | Marina Bay Sands adjusted EBITDA | $788M |
| Macao adjusted property EBITDA | Consolidated adjusted property EBITDA | $633M |
| Marina Bay Sands adjusted EBITDA | Consolidated adjusted property EBITDA | $788M |